There appears to be some misunderstanding regarding the recent communication from the Registrar of the Supreme Court concerning the use of the title "Barrister." Some have interpreted the directive to mean that it is now unlawful for anyone to address a legal practitioner as "Barrister." With respect, I do not believe that is the correct interpretation. In my view, the directive is essentially an administrative and professional guideline regulating how legal practitioners should describe themselves in official documents, particularly court processes and formal correspondence. It is directed at lawyers in the conduct of their professional practice, not at members of the public in their everyday interactions. The circular does not create a criminal offence. It does not make it a crime for anyone to call a lawyer "Barrister," nor does it render a lawyer liable simply because another person chooses to address him or her by ...
Legal diary news Https://mlegaldiary.blogspot.