Skip to main content

Upholding the Constitutional Right to Fair Hearing: A Landmark Judgment


In the  recent case of "First Option Motors Ltd. & Anor. vs. Ogun State Government & Ors"
the Court of Appeal delivered a significant judgment emphasizing the importance of the constitutional right to fair hearing. The case centered around the revocation of the appellants' land title without affording them an opportunity to present their case. This article explores the key principles discussed in the judgment and their implications for adhoc bodies tasked with determining individuals' rights.

The Principle of Fair Hearing:
The Court of Appeal reiterated that the right to fair hearing is a fundamental principle enshrined in the Nigerian Constitution. Section 36(1) of the 1999 Constitution guarantees that every person is entitled to a fair hearing within a reasonable time by a court or tribunal established by law. This principle applies not only to courts but also to adhoc bodies with the authority to determine individuals' rights.

The Obligation to Hear Parties:
The judgment emphasized that parties must be given the opportunity to present their case before their rights are affected. Denying a party the right to be heard not only violates the principles of fair hearing but also renders the entire proceedings null and void. The court cited various precedents that underscored the importance of hearing both sides of a dispute and the consequences of breaching this fundamental principle.
Adhoc Bodies and Fair Hearing:
The Court of Appeal clarified that adhoc bodies, such as commissions of inquiry, must also adhere to fair hearing rules. The fact that a body is established to conduct fact-finding does not exempt it from the obligation to observe fair hearing principles. The court held that any proceedings conducted in breach of fair hearing rights, regardless of how well-conducted they may be, would be rendered null and void.
Implications of the Judgment:
The judgment in *First Option Motors Ltd. & Anor. vs. Ogun State Government & Ors.* has significant implications for the protection of individuals' rights. It establishes that any decision or recommendation made without affording parties a fair hearing is fundamentally flawed and can be set aside. The breach of fair hearing has a profound effect on the proceedings and renders any subsequent actions based on such a breach null and void.

Conclusion:
The Court of Appeal's judgment in *First Option Motors Ltd. & Anor. vs. Ogun State Government & Ors.* serves as a landmark decision reaffirming the constitutional right to fair hearing. It highlights the obligation of adhoc bodies to observe fair

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NBA Anaocha Branch Honours Okey Wali, SAN with Hall Naming Recognition.

NBA Anaocha Branch Names Hall After Okey Wali, SAN The (NBA), Anaocha Branch (Family Bar), has resolved to name its main meeting hall after the 26th President of the Association, . This decision was reached during the Branch’s monthly general meeting, where members unanimously approved the naming of the hall as “Hon. Okey Wali, SAN Hall of Honour.” The honour is in recognition of Okey Wali, SAN’s outstanding contributions to the legal profession, as well as his enduring support and commitment to the growth and unity of the Nigerian Bar, particularly the Anaocha Branch. According to the Branch, the resolution reflects deep appreciation for his legacy of service, leadership, and dedication to the advancement of justice and the rule of law. The formal naming and commissioning of the hall will take place during the Branch’s 2026 Law Week , scheduled to commence on May 8, 2026 . The event is expected to attract members of the Bar, senior advocates, and key stakeholders wi...

STATEMENT BY THE CHAIRMAN, NBA ABUJA BRANCH (UNITY BAR)

NBA ABUJA BRANCH CONDEMNS THE ARREST, HARASSMENT AND DETENTION OF LAWYERS IN THE COURSE OF PROFESSIONAL DUTIES The Nigerian Bar Association, Abuja Branch (Unity Bar), strongly condemns the arrest, handcuffing, harassment and detention of *Mr. Simon Eromosele, Esq.*, a member of the NBA Abuja Branch (Unity Bar), on the 14th of August, 2026, while carrying out his legitimate professional duties as Counsel. From the account presented to the Branch, Mr. Eromosele was at the OPay office in Jabi, Abuja, to follow up on a formal request made on behalf of his client concerning debit restrictions placed on the client’s OPay account, and to seek disclosure of the legal basis for the restriction, including the production of any court order purportedly authorising it. Rather than being permitted to complete that professional engagement, Mr. Eromosele was reportedly arrested, handcuffed and taken first to the Utako Police Station and subsequently to the IG Monitoring Unit at Force Headq...

PRESS RELEASE

NBA ABUJA BRANCH CONDEMNS THE ILLEGAL ARREST AND DETENTION OF SIMON AROMOSELE, ESQ. IN THE COURSE OF THE DISCHARGE OF HIS LAWFUL PROFESSIONAL DUTIES The Nigerian Bar Association, Abuja Branch (Unity Bar), strongly condemns the illegal arrest and detention of one of its members, Mr. Simon Aromosele, Esq., today by officers of the Inspector General of Police Monitoring Unit, Force Headquarters, Abuja, in connection with the discharge of his lawful professional duties. Mr. Aromosele was arrested for writing to OPay Bank on behalf of his client, requesting the lifting of a restriction on his client's account or the production of the court order authorising the restriction. The Investigating Police Officer, DSP Gambo Adamu of the IGP Monitoring Unit, Force Headquarters confirmed during an interaction with the Branch's officials that the only act for which Mr. Aromosele was arrested and detained is the writing of the said letter on behalf of his client. The Branch str...