Skip to main content

The president of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) has come out boldly to criticize the purported amendment on the RPC by the General council of the Bar, which was done to be in comformity with the Legal Practioners Act, as was stated by the chairman of the General Counil of the Bar.

The NBA President has called on lawyers to maintain status quo on the position of the RPC ,and urged everyone to continue with their normal businesses and disregard the said amendment, stating that no notice was sent to NBA before the said amendment by the general council of the Bar.
According to the NBA President, Mr OLUMIDE AkPATA, base on the message we  got from his Facebook page, the recently Inaugurated president of NBA has this to say;
I have seen and read Statutory Instrument No. 15 of 2020 (the “Instrument”), making the rounds on social media and which purports to amend certain provisions of the 2007 Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners (RPC).  Since the Instrument was released, I have received numerous calls and messages from lawyers across the country seeking clarification and guidance on the purport of the Instrument. 

By virtue of the Instrument, the following provisions of the RPC are to be deemed deleted:

a) Rule 9(2), which relates to default in payment of practicing fees;

b) Rule 10, which relates to stamp and seal for legal practitioners;

c) Rule 11, which relates to mandatory continuing professional development;

d) Rule 12, which relates to the Annual Practicing Certificate for legal practitioners; and 

e) Rule 13, which relates to the obligation to give notice of the commencement of legal practice to the branch of the Nigerian Bar Association (“NBA”) responsible for the jurisdiction in which the practice is located. 

The explanatory note to the Instrument suggests that it was done to bring the RPC into conformity with the provisions of the Legal Practitioners Act, the Law Officers Act, and the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended).

For the avoidance of doubt, the Legal Practitioners Act (as amended) confers the power to issue rules of professional conduct for legal practitioners, and any amendments thereto, on the General Council of the Bar (the “Bar Council”). The Bar Council comprises the Honourable Attorney-General of the Federation (“HAGF”), the Honourable Attorneys-General of the thirty-six states of Nigeria, and twenty members of the NBA. Consequently, the RPC and any amendments thereto may only be validly issued after it has been deliberated upon and approved at a properly convened meeting of the Bar Council.

As far as the NBA is aware, no notice convening a meeting of the Bar Council was issued to its elected representatives on the Bar Council and no meeting of the Bar Council was convened and/or held to deliberate on the Instrument. To that extent, our position is that no authority or approval was given for the amendment of the RPC. Consequently, the NBA maintains that the RPC has not been amended and enjoins all legal practitioners to remain calm and continue to conduct their affairs in the same manner as they did prior to the issuance of the Instrument. 

Let me assure our members that I am engaging closely with the HAGF on this issue and will provide further updates on our next steps in the coming days.  Indeed, as part of the commitment of the current administration of the NBA towards the welfare's and capacity building of members and the overall improvement of the Bar, we intend to propose certain amendments to the RPC that will be critical to the attainment of those objectives. However, in doing this, we will ensure to carry our members along with a view to getting their buy-in as critical stakeholders. 

OLUMIDE AKPATA
President, Nigerian Bar Association 
13th September 2020

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NBA Anaocha Branch Honours Okey Wali, SAN with Hall Naming Recognition.

NBA Anaocha Branch Names Hall After Okey Wali, SAN The (NBA), Anaocha Branch (Family Bar), has resolved to name its main meeting hall after the 26th President of the Association, . This decision was reached during the Branch’s monthly general meeting, where members unanimously approved the naming of the hall as “Hon. Okey Wali, SAN Hall of Honour.” The honour is in recognition of Okey Wali, SAN’s outstanding contributions to the legal profession, as well as his enduring support and commitment to the growth and unity of the Nigerian Bar, particularly the Anaocha Branch. According to the Branch, the resolution reflects deep appreciation for his legacy of service, leadership, and dedication to the advancement of justice and the rule of law. The formal naming and commissioning of the hall will take place during the Branch’s 2026 Law Week , scheduled to commence on May 8, 2026 . The event is expected to attract members of the Bar, senior advocates, and key stakeholders wi...

OTU OKA-IWU ABUJA SETS AGENDA ON RESTORATIVE JUSTICE REFORMS

In a continued effort to deepen legal discourse and professional development among its members, Otu Oka-iwu Abuja (the association of Igbo lawyers in the Federal Capital Territory) has announced its forthcoming general meeting, scheduled to hold on Friday, 22 May 2026. The meeting, which will take place at Hall 3, Novare Shopping Complex, Wuse Zone 5, Abuja, is expected to convene a distinguished gathering of learned seniors and colleagues within the legal profession. Proceedings will commence promptly at 4:00 PM, with Chief Okechukwu Ajunwa, SAN, graciously serving as host. A major highlight of the meeting will be the association’s Learning Series, designed to promote continuous legal education and engagement with emerging trends in jurisprudence. This edition will feature Mrs. Miriam Komboh-Eze, Director of the Restorative Justice Centre, Abuja Multi-Door Courthouse (AMDC), who will deliver a thought-provoking presentation on the theme: “Restorative Justice...

The First Major Casualty of Section 83 of the Electoral Act 2026 May Have Emerged

The recent decision of the Federal High Court in Fubara Dagogo v. All Progressives Congress (APC) & 3 Ors., Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/591/2026 delivered by Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, represents a significant development in Nigeria’s pre-election jurisprudence. In that case, the court struck out the suit challenging the APC National Congress and proceeded to award punitive costs of ₦10 million each against the plaintiff, Mr. Fubara Dagogo, and his counsel, Chief Sir O.A.U. Onyema, for what the court considered a frivolous and non-justiciable action. The court held that the dispute arose purely from the internal congress and nomination processes of the political party and therefore fell outside the jurisdiction of the court by virtue of Section 83(5) of the Electoral Act 2026.  Justice Abdulmalik maintained that there was no allegation or proof of any breach of the Constitution, the Electoral Act, or the party’s constitution and guidelines capable of warranting judicial inte...

Section 83 and the Myth of Judicial Silence in Party Politics

The recent assertion by my brother, Festus Okoye Esq, that lawyers have become scapegoats in internal party conflicts owing to their recourse to the courts calls for careful constitutional and judicial interrogation. At the centre of this debate lies Section 83 of the Electoral Act 2026, particularly the suggestion that it absolutely ousts the jurisdiction of the courts over the internal affairs of political parties. With the greatest respect to lawyers who are holding this view, that broad interpretation may appear overstretched and not constitutionally sustainable. Section 83(5) of the Electoral Act, read in isolation, appears to bar courts from entertaining disputes relating to party internal issues absolutely.  On a literal reading, it suggests a legislative intent to shield political parties from judicial scrutiny. That may not absolutely be true. Such a construction ignores a foundational principle of Nigeria’s constitutional order, which is the fact that...

Justice Delivery and Prevailing Conflicting Judgments: An Imperative for Urgent Judicial Reforms

I had the rare  privilege of participating as a panelist at the Biennial Law Week of the Nigerian Bar Association, Anaocha Branch, Anambra State this weekend,  where distinguished Professors of Law, Justices of various courts, Senior Advocates of Nigeria, and legal scholars gathered to interrogate one of the most pressing challenges confronting the Nigerian judiciary today: "the growing menace of conflicting judgments and the urgent need for judicial reforms". The topic was not only timely but fundamental to the survival of public confidence in the administration of justice. A judiciary that speaks with contradictory voices weakens the rule of law, undermines democratic stability, and erodes citizens’ faith in the courts as impartial arbiters of justice. Conflicting judgments occur when courts of coordinate jurisdiction issue inconsistent decisions on the same subject matter, thereby creating uncertainty and confusion in the legal system. Unfortunately, this distu...

Vetoed Bills: Legislative Lawyer, Dr. Jaja and ALDRAP to Hire Dr. Ajulo, SAN to File Lawsuit Against Rivers State House of Assembly.

  In a bid to seek clarification on the recent vetoed bills by the Rivers State House of Assembly, renowned legislative drafting lawyer, Dr. Tonye Jaja, and the Association of Legislative Drafting and Advocacy Practitioners (ALDRAP) have decided to hire the services of Dr. Ajulo, SAN. The lawsuit aims to determine whether the assembly has complied with the constitutional provisions regarding the vetoed bills.                         Dr. Ajulo, SAN. The Issues for determination: The lawsuit intends to address several key issues that have arisen from the vetoed bills. These issues include: 1. Compliance with Timeframe: The first issue to be determined is whether the Rivers State House of Assembly adhered to the constitutional provision that requires a 30-day period to elapse from when the bill was submitted to the governor. 2. Legislative Authority: The second issue revolves around whether a State Hou...

Courts and their jurisdiction.

There are different types of courts in Nigeria. Each of them has its own functions. So, what are the hierarchy of courts in Nigeria? Let's find this out together. Actually, courts in Nigeria are renowned and recognized as the hallowed chambers of jurisdiction, where candid justice is meted out to all and sundry, without favoritism, sentiment, emotion, or being unnecessarily involved in crass legalism. What is more, we do not only have courts of law but courts of equity as well. The Nigerian Constitution divides the government’s structure into three branches – the legislative, executive, and judiciary. According to the Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution, judicial powers are vested in the courts. Courts are authorized by law to exercise jurisdiction at first instance, and on appeals in all proceedings and actions relating to matters between people, or between government/authority and any person in Nigeria. It is also aimed at defining any question as to the civil rights a...

The Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) has cleared all $7 billion foreign exchange (forex) backlog inherited by Governor Yemi Cardoso.

In a statement yesterday 20th, of March, 2024, the Acting Director of Corporate Communications, Central Bank of Nigeria ( CBN ), Mrs. Hakama Sidi Ali, confirmed the settlement of all valid forex backlog claims. Governor Cardoso had emphasised the importance of clearing the backlog to restore credibility in the Nigerian economy. He stated that, “we made clearing the forex backlog a priority to restore credibility and confidence in the Nigerian economy.” He underscored the significance of resolving this issue, stating, “This encumbrance to market confidence in the country’s ability to meet its obligations is now totally behind us.” The CBN’s commitment to tackling the forex backlog appeared to be paying off.  External reserves have seen a significant rise. The Nation had reported the reserves rose to its highest point in nine moinths last weekened. This increase was attributed to a notable rise in remittance payments from Nigerians abroad and increased foreign investment in local ass...

Otu oka-iwu Abuja endorses Mazi Afam Osigwe SAN as NBA Presidential Candidate in the 2024 NBA Election.

The Igbo Lawyers Group Comes Out in Support for Afam Osigwe as their tradition demands in Forthcoming NBA Election The umbrella organization of Igbo lawyers in Abuja, Otu Oka-iwu Abuja, has endorsed Mazi Afam Osigwe as its candidate for the forthcoming NBA presidential election. The President of Otu Oka-iwu Abuja made this announcement during a meeting with Igbo lawyers in Gwagwalada, highlighting Osigwe's dedication and contributions to the Igbo lawyers' association (Otu oka-iwu Abuja). The President emphasized the importance of supporting Osigwe at this critical moment, in line with the organization's tradition and values. The President highlighted the fact that the constitution of Otu oka-iwu Abuja was financed and printed by Mazi Afam Osigwe single-handedly, adding that it has been a longstanding norm to rally behind members of the association whenever they are contesting against non-members. In line with this principle, the publicity Secretary, Mrs. Bridge ...

LET OLUNIDE AKPATA HAVE A GOOD BREATH-SELAH TO THOSE CLAMORING FOR A SAN CANDIDACY .

WHO IS AFRAID OF OLUMIDE AKPATA? The desperation to kick out Olumide Akpata at all cost from the NBA presidential election [as they did to Mazi Afam Osigwe during the last cycle] is so sickening. It stinks to high heaven!  1. First they said he is not from the West and cannot run for office. That one failed, and the ECNBA cleared the man. 2. They called him all sorts of names for donating palliatives to his NBA branch at the peak of the Coronavirus pandemic, and called for his disqualification because, according to them, this kind gesture (which his detractors never showed their colleagues) was designed to entice lawyers! This failed. 3. They said he is not a SAN and has no litigation experience because the NBA only belongs to awon "My Lord, May I?" Apologies to Lasisi Elenu. Like the ones before it, this propaganda failed. 4. Then, they wrote a terribly insulting letter calling on the Body of SANs to make sure no junior lawyer ("including Mr Akpata who has b...