- Vicarious liability refers to a situation where someone is held responsible for the actions or omissions of another person. In a workplace context, an employer can be liable for the acts or omissions of its employees, provided it can be shown that they took place in the course of their employment.
- Vicarious liability is a form of a strict, secondary liability that arises under the common law doctrine yof agency, respondeat superior, the responsibility of the superior for the acts of their subordinate or, in a broader sense, the responsibility of any third party that had the "right, ability or duty to control" the activities of a violator. It can be distinguished from contributory liability, another form of secondary liability, which is rooted in the tort theory of enterprise liability because, unlike contributory infringement, knowledge is not an element of vicarious liability.The law has developed the view that some relationships by their nature require the person who engages others to accept responsibility for the wrongdoing of those others. The most important such relationship for practical purposes is that of employer and employee
- Employers' liabilit:
- Employers are vicariously liable, under the respondeat superior doctrine, for negligent acts or omissions by their employees in the course of employment (sometimes referred to as 'scope and course of employment').To determine whether the employer is liable, the difference between an independent contractor and an employee is to be drawn. In order to be vicariously liable, there must be a requisite relationship between the defendant the tortfeasor, which could be examined by three tests: Control test, Organisation test and Sufficient relationship test. An employer may be held liable under principles of vicarious liability if an employee does an authorized act in an unauthorized way.
- Employers may also be liable under the common law principle represented in the Latin phrase, qui facit per alium facit per se (one who acts through another acts in one's own interests). That is a parallel concept to vicarious liability and strict liability, in which one person is held liable in criminal law or tort for the acts or omissions of another.
- The owner of an automobile can be held vicariously liable for negligence committed by a person to whom the car has been lent, as if the owner was a principal and the driver his or her agent, if the driver is using the car primarily for the purpose of performing a task for the ow
- ner. Courts have been reluctant to extend this liability to the owners of other kinds of chattel. For example, the owner of a plane will not be vicariously liable for the actions of a pilot to whom he or she has lent it to perform the owner's purpose.
- One example is in the case of a bank, finance company or other lienholder performing a repossession of an automobile from the registered owner for non-payment, the lienholder has a non-delegable duty not to cause a breach of the peace in performing the repossession, or it will be liable for damages even if the repossession is performed by an agent. This requirement means that whether a repossession is performed by the lienholder or by an agent, the repossessor must not cause a breach of the peace or the lienholder will be held responsible.
The Court of Appeal, sitting in Lagos, upheld Hon. Sunday Cyriacus Umeha's appeal against the decision of the National and State House of Assembly Tribunal.
In a recent statement issued by Rt. Hon. Barr Sunday Cyriacus Umeha, the Member representing Ezeagu/Udi Federal Constituency in the National Assembly, he expressed his joy and gratitude following a resounding victory at the Court of Appeal. This victory comes after a challenging legal battle that threatened to nullify the mandate given to him by the people during the February 2023 elections. In his statement, Hon. Sunday Cyriacus Umeha extends his appreciation to his constituents, legal team, and party members while emphasizing his commitment to improving the socioeconomic circumstances of the people he represents. The Court of Appeal, sitting in Lagos, upheld Hon. Sunday Cyriacus Umeha's appeal against the decision of the National and State House of Assembly Tribunal. The unanimous judgment of the three-man panel led by Hon. Mr. Justice S.T. Hussein JCA not only resolved all the issues in favor of Hon. Umeha but also dismissed the Cross Appeal filed by his opponents. T...
Comments
Post a Comment
Drop your comment here.