Skip to main content

INEC's Initial Declaration Upheld by Federal Court of Appeal, Professor Sunday Nnamchi Confirmed Winner of Enugu East/Isi-Uzo Federal Constituency Election

               PROF. SUNDAY NNAMCHI
The Court of Appeal comfirms Certificate of Return Presented to Labour Party Candidate, Validating INEC's Decision

In a significant development, the Federal Court of Appeal has upheld the initial declaration made by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) regarding the Enugu East/Isi-Uzo Federal Constituency election held on the 25th of February, 2023. The court's decision confirms Prof.Sunday Nnamchi, the candidate of the Labour Party, as the rightful winner of the election, further strengthening the credibility of INEC's judgment.

On the day of the election, INEC declared Prof. Sunday Nnamchi as the winner of the Enugu East/Isi-Uzo Federal Constituency seat formerly occupied by Hon. NNAJI PRINCE CORNELIUS during  the eight Assembly. Subsequently, a certificate of return was duly presented to him, signifying his victory and eligibility to assume the position.
           Hon. NNAJI PRINCE CORNELIUS
However, the election result faced a legal challenge when the Enugu Tribunal annulled Prof.Nnamchi's victory and declared Prince Cornelius Nnaji of the PDP as the winner instead. This decision by the Enugu Tribunal sparked controversy and raised concerns about the accuracy and fairness of their findings.

In response to the Tribunal's decision, Prof. Nnamchi and the Labour Party filed an appeal with the Federal Court of Appeal, seeking a review of the ruling. After careful consideration of the evidence presented, the court has now overturned the Enugu Tribunal's decision, thereby validating INEC's initial declaration.

This turn of events not only restores Prof.Nnamchi's position as the rightful winner but also affirms the trust and confidence in INEC's ability to conduct free and fair elections. The Federal Court of Appeal's decision serves as a testament to the importance of an independent judiciary in ensuring the integrity of the electoral process.

With the court's ruling, Professor Sunday Nnamchi can now fully assume his duties as the representative for the Enugu East/Isi-Uzo Federal Constituency. This outcome is a victory for democracy and the will of the people who cast their votes in support of his candidacy.
As we celebrate this resolution, it is crucial to reflect on the significance of transparent and accountable electoral processes. The adherence to democratic principles and the rule of law is vital for upholding the trust of the electorate and maintaining the stability of our democratic system.
Congratulations to Professor Sunday Nnamchi on his well-deserved victory and the validation of his election as the representative for the Enugu East/Isi-Uzo Federal Constituency. May his tenure be marked by dedication, integrity, and a commitment to serving the needs of his constituents.

This case serves as a reminder of the importance of upholding the sanctity of the electoral process and ensuring that the will of the people prevails. The Federal Court of Appeal's decision reinforces the belief that justice ultimately triumphs, and democracy remains the cornerstone of our nation.

Let us hope that this outcome will inspire further efforts to strengthen our electoral system and foster a culture of trust, transparency, and fairness in future elections across Nigeria.

                 SolarForAll:
To get an efficient Solar system anywhere in Nigeria; with 25 years warranty and “Pay Small Small” for up to two years, call/chat Solar For All Ltd: 08060266163.
(Abuja) Suite A8, Kenuj O2 Mall, Behind Games Village.
(Lagos) No 113A, Mainland Way, Dolphin Estate, Ikoyi.
(Enugu State)-Ehalumona Junction. 

Published from Blogger Prime Android App
Log in to primsol.lawpavilion.com and enjoy the best E-journals, textbooks, and many more To subscribe to Primsol, go to:  store.lawpavilion.com.
For further enquiries/assistance, send an email to customercare@lawpavilion.com or phone call: 08050298729


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NBA SECURES LANDMARK JUDGMENT ON THE STATUS OF LAWYERS IN THE NIGERIA POLICE FORCE

Dear Colleagues, I am pleased to formally inform all members of our dear association of the landmark judgment delivered by the National Industrial Court of Nigeria, Abuja Judicial Division, on 10 July 2026 in Suit No. NICN/ABJ/264/2025: Incorporated Trustees of the Nigerian Bar Association v. Police Service Commission & 5 Ors. This public interest action was instituted by the Nigerian Bar Association through the Section on Public Interest and Development Law (SPIDEL) to seek judicial interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of the Police Act, 2020 and the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners, 2023, particularly as they relate to the status, functions, and deployment of legal practitioners serving within the Nigeria Police Force. In a well-considered judgment, the Court upheld substantial aspects of the NBA’s claims and made important declarations and consequential orders, including: 1. Declaring that police officers who are legal practitioners b...

Are We at a Judicial Crossroads with the Decisions of Justices Umar and Omotosho on INEC’s Electoral Guidelines?

The two decisions of the Federal High Court delivered respectively by Justice Mohammed G. Umar and Justice James Kolawole Omotosho are already generating intense constitutional and electoral discourse within legal circles. Both judgments dealt with the legality of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)’s administrative timetable and guidelines issued for the 2027 general elections vis-à-vis the provisions of the Electoral Act 2026. Although both courts addressed substantially similar legal questions, they arrived at partially convergent and partially divergent conclusions. This has now sparked debate among senior members of the Bar on whether Justice Omotosho ought to be reprimanded for allegedly delivering a judgment inconsistent with that of Justice Umar. This article examines the two judgments, identifies their points of agreement and disagreement, and evaluates whether the controversy over judicial contradiction is legally sustainable or merely academic se...

Nigerian Bar Association, Abuja Branch Swears in New Executives body, as Steve Emelieze and Onyeka Obiajulu Emerge Chairman and Secretary Respectively.

In a significant development, the Abuja Branch of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) held a swearing-in ceremony for its new executive committee members on Monday, June 10th, 2024. The ceremony took place at the auditorium of the NBA House and was graced by the President of the NBA, Y.C Maikyau SAN, along with several other dignitaries. The newly sworn-in executive committee members, led by Steve Emelieze, Esq as Chairman, and Onyeka Obiajulu, Esq as Secretary, took the oath of office during the ceremony. This marks an important milestone for the NBA Abuja Branch as it strives to strengthen its leadership and enhance its services to members. The association remains steadfast in its commitment to promoting the rule of law, justice, and the welfare of legal practitioners in Abuja. The newly elected executive committee members are as follows:                       Steve Okechukwu Emelieze ,             ...

NBA Anaocha Branch Honours Okey Wali, SAN with Hall Naming Recognition.

NBA Anaocha Branch Names Hall After Okey Wali, SAN The (NBA), Anaocha Branch (Family Bar), has resolved to name its main meeting hall after the 26th President of the Association, . This decision was reached during the Branch’s monthly general meeting, where members unanimously approved the naming of the hall as “Hon. Okey Wali, SAN Hall of Honour.” The honour is in recognition of Okey Wali, SAN’s outstanding contributions to the legal profession, as well as his enduring support and commitment to the growth and unity of the Nigerian Bar, particularly the Anaocha Branch. According to the Branch, the resolution reflects deep appreciation for his legacy of service, leadership, and dedication to the advancement of justice and the rule of law. The formal naming and commissioning of the hall will take place during the Branch’s 2026 Law Week , scheduled to commence on May 8, 2026 . The event is expected to attract members of the Bar, senior advocates, and key stakeholders wi...

GROUNDS FOR OBJECTING TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF A DOCUMENT IN PROCEEDINGS IN NIGERIA.

GROUNDS FOR OBJECTING TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF A DOCUMENT IN PROCEEDINGS IN NIGERIA.  The position of E.C MPI, Esq When a witness is led in evidence in chief to tender a document, such a witness is referred to his deposition on oath and pointed to a place where he pleaded the document the document sought to be tendered. Counsel applies to show the document to the witness and asked if he recognises the document and thereafter an application to tender is made to the court. The court directs the registrar to show the document to the other counsel to either object to the admissibility of the document or allow it to be admitted. Most lawyers are faced with the problem of objecting to certain documents and sometimes when they object, they loose the point of law on which to hinge their objections. Admissibility of a document can only be objected to on points of law and in accordance with the provisions of the Evidence Act. This piece serves as a guide on how to object to documents sough...

Preventing ATM Card Swapping at POS Centers: Safeguarding Your Finances EFCC CONNECT to Hold Awareness Lecture on October 25, 2023, at 6pm.

Safeguarding Your Finances: Preventing ATM Card Swapping at POS Centers Financial crimes have become increasingly prevalent in our society, and one area where they frequently occur is at Point of Sale (POS) centers. The EFCC CONNECT awareness lecture aims to educate individuals on the importance of financial security and provide valuable tips on protecting their savings and ATM cards. This article delves into the significance of attending such lectures and the measures we can take to prevent ATM card swapping at POS centers. Understanding the Threat: As technology advances, so do the tactics employed by criminals. ATM card swapping is a method used by fraudsters to gain unauthorized access to victims' bank accounts. These criminals discreetly switch the victim's legitimate ATM card with a counterfeit one, allowing them to withdraw funds or make unauthorized transactions. The EFCC CONNECT Awareness Lecture: The EFCC CONNECT awareness lecture is an initiative designed...

The Value of Legal Practice and the Dignity of the Profession.

The statement by that “Do not be a lawyer who charges so low that your clients do not understand the value of the profession” is not merely a comment about legal fees; it is a profound reminder about the dignity, value, and integrity of legal practice. Law is a noble profession built on years of rigorous academic training, discipline, sacrifice, and continuous learning. Every lawyer invests enormous time, resources, and mental energy in acquiring the knowledge and skills required to represent clients effectively. Beyond the years spent in universities and the Nigerian Law School, legal practitioners daily bear the burden of advocacy, research, drafting, negotiations, court appearances, and the responsibility of protecting the rights and interests of clients. Unfortunately, the increasing trend of underpricing legal services has continued to diminish the perceived value of the profession. When lawyers charge excessively low fees merely to attract clients, it sends a dan...

The First Major Casualty of Section 83 of the Electoral Act 2026 May Have Emerged

The recent decision of the Federal High Court in Fubara Dagogo v. All Progressives Congress (APC) & 3 Ors., Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/591/2026 delivered by Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, represents a significant development in Nigeria’s pre-election jurisprudence. In that case, the court struck out the suit challenging the APC National Congress and proceeded to award punitive costs of ₦10 million each against the plaintiff, Mr. Fubara Dagogo, and his counsel, Chief Sir O.A.U. Onyema, for what the court considered a frivolous and non-justiciable action. The court held that the dispute arose purely from the internal congress and nomination processes of the political party and therefore fell outside the jurisdiction of the court by virtue of Section 83(5) of the Electoral Act 2026.  Justice Abdulmalik maintained that there was no allegation or proof of any breach of the Constitution, the Electoral Act, or the party’s constitution and guidelines capable of warranting judicial inte...

Common Problems in Marriage: A Review of the Book of Sirach

Common Problems in Marriage: A Review of the Book of Sirach Marriage is a sacred institution ordained by God, but it is not immune to challenges. Domestic violence, spouse abuse, and other issues can strain a marriage, causing emotional and physical harm to one or both partners. In this article, we will explore these common problems in marriage and examine the teachings of the Book of Sirach on how a Christian marriage should be nurtured. Domestic Violence and Spouse Abuse Domestic violence and spouse abuse are never acceptable in any marriage. The Book of Sirach (25:26) warns, "A wicked wife is a bitter thing, her boldness is like a lion's yoke." This verse highlights the destructive nature of abuse and violence in a marriage. Sirach (26:1-4) also emphasizes the importance of a virtuous wife, who brings joy and peace to her husband. Other Challenges in Marriage Other common challenges in marriage include communication breakdown, financial stress, infidelity, ...

Section 83 and the Myth of Judicial Silence in Party Politics

The recent assertion by my brother, Festus Okoye Esq, that lawyers have become scapegoats in internal party conflicts owing to their recourse to the courts calls for careful constitutional and judicial interrogation. At the centre of this debate lies Section 83 of the Electoral Act 2026, particularly the suggestion that it absolutely ousts the jurisdiction of the courts over the internal affairs of political parties. With the greatest respect to lawyers who are holding this view, that broad interpretation may appear overstretched and not constitutionally sustainable. Section 83(5) of the Electoral Act, read in isolation, appears to bar courts from entertaining disputes relating to party internal issues absolutely.  On a literal reading, it suggests a legislative intent to shield political parties from judicial scrutiny. That may not absolutely be true. Such a construction ignores a foundational principle of Nigeria’s constitutional order, which is the fact that...