Skip to main content

Courts and their jurisdiction.

There are different types of courts in Nigeria. Each of them has its own functions. So, what are the hierarchy of courts in Nigeria? Let's find this out together.


Actually, courts in Nigeria are renowned and recognized as the hallowed chambers of jurisdiction, where candid justice is meted out to all and sundry, without favoritism, sentiment, emotion, or being unnecessarily involved in crass legalism. What is more, we do not only have courts of law but courts of equity as well.


The Nigerian Constitution divides the government’s structure into three branches – the legislative, executive, and judiciary. According to the Section 6 of the 1999 Constitution, judicial powers are vested in the courts.


Courts are authorized by law to exercise jurisdiction at first instance, and on appeals in all proceedings and actions relating to matters between people, or between government/authority and any person in Nigeria. It is also aimed at defining any question as to the civil rights and duties of that person.


Types of courts in Nigeria


Find out the hierarchy of courts in Nigeria below.


1. The Supreme Court of Nigeria


The first one is the Supreme Court of Nigeria which is the Nigerian highest Court. It was established in 1963 subsequent to the enunciation of the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the 1960 Constitution, which became effective on October 1, 1963. It also succeeded the cancellation of Section 120, which repealed the appellate jurisdiction of the Privy Council judicial committee, which was the Nigeria’s Apex Court.


The Court is provided for in Section 230 of the 1999 Constitution. According to this provision, the court will consist of the Chief Justice of Nigeria and 21 (twenty-one) judges at all times. Actually, the court’s decision on any matter is binding and final without any form of a retrial.


Of course, this does not include the powers of the Governor or the President of the country as they can grant a reprieve to any person condemned of an offense under any law in Nigeria. Furthermore, the decision of the Supreme Court may be canceled by legislation and the Supreme Court can even nullify itself.


The Supreme Court is presently located in Abuja, Nigeria. Its jurisdiction is the highest and most important in the country. This consequently means that no appeal can be heard regarding matters decided by the supreme court before any other Nigerian court.


In general, these matters include any controversy between the Federation and the State or between States. As far as that controversy involves any matter (whether of fact or law) on which an existence of a legal right is called into question. Basically, the Supreme Court does not have the original jurisdiction on just any criminal matter. In addition, it has the jurisdiction to the exclusion of any other court in Nigeria to determine and hear any proclamation from the Court of Appeal.


2. The Court of Appeal


The next one on the hierarchy of Nigerian courts is the Court of Appeal. Compared to the Supreme Court, which is located only in Abuja, the Court of Appeal is separated into various judicial divisions and sits in definite States in Nigeria. It was established by Section 237 of the 1999 Constitution, led by the President of the Court of Appeal, and comprises of 49 (forty-nine) judges at all times.


The Court of Appeal has the original jurisdiction to the exception of all other courts in Nigeria to determine and hear any question as to whether any person has been validly voted to the office of the Governor or Deputy Governor, the President or Vice-President in Nigeria. It appeals from the High Court of a State, the Federal High Court, the Customary Court of Appeal of a State, Sharia Court of Appeal of the Federal Capital Territory, the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, the Court Martial, Sharia Court of Appeal of a State, and any other Tribunal.


Like the completeness of Supreme Court decisions, the Court of Appeal also possesses the completeness of decisions on appeals coming from the resolutions of the State and National Houses of Assembly election petitions and also, on the appeal coming from any civil jurisdiction of the National Industrial Court.



3. The Federal High Court


Just like the Court of Appeal, the Federal High Court is divided into various judicial divisions for administrative convenience and sits in more than 15 States in Nigeria. Section 249 of the 1999 Constitution provides for the existence of the Federal High Court.


The Federal High Court is headed by the Chief Judge and contains the number of Judges allowed may be preassigned by an Act of the National Assembly. But we should point out, that it can be properly constituted if it contains at least one Judge of the Court. This Court has original jurisdiction in civil cases, and matters as set out under Section 251 (1) of the 1999 Constitution.


It should be mentioned that the Federal High Court also has the appellate jurisdiction and all the powers of the High Courts of a State. This court divides the concurrent jurisdiction of the State High Court in matters regarding the interpretation or application of the constitution, banker-customer relationship, and fundamental human rights enforcement cases.


4. The High Court of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) / State High Court


The Section 255 of the 1999 Constitution provides for the ascertainment of a High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. While Section 270 provides for the ascertainment of a High Court for each State of the Federation.


So, the State High Court and the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory particularly are headed by the Chief Judge. The number of Judges they contain is prescribed by the State House of Assembly (in respect of the High Court of a State) or an Act of National Assembly (in respect of the High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja). The High Court has the largest jurisdiction under the 1999 Constitution in civil and criminal cases and has the appellant jurisdiction over decisions of Customary Courts, Area Courts, Magistrate Courts, etc.


5. The National Industrial Court


As for the National Industrial Court, it is established by Section 254A of the 1999 Constitution. It is headed by the President of the National Industrial Court and the number of Judges depend on what is prescribed by an Act of the National Assembly.


Just like the Federal High Court, the National Industrial Court is also divided into various judicial separations for administrative convenience which sits in some States in Nigeria. The National Industrial Court focuses on the jurisdiction in civil cases and grounds that are set out in Section 254C of the 1999 Constitution. It has all the powers of the High Court of a State and the appellate jurisdiction.


6. The Sharia Court of Appeal


The Section 260 of the 1999 Constitution provides for an obligatory establishment of the Sharia Court of Appeal of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja. While Section 275 provides for a dispensable establishment of a Sharia Court of Appeal for any State that claims it is in Nigeria.


Actually, both courts are headed by a Grand Kadi and contain a number of Kadis that is prescribed by an Act of the National Assembly for Sharia Court of Appeal of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja and the House of Assembly of a State for a State Sharia Court of Appeal. Also, both courts exercise the supervisory and appellate jurisdiction in civil cases involving issues of the Islamic personal law.


7. The Customary Court of Appeal


The Customary Court of Appeal of the Federal Capital Territory was established by the Section 265 of the 1999 Constitution and caters to the FCT. While Section 280 provides for the dispensable establishment of the Customary Court of Appeal for any State that claims it in Nigeria.


In general, both courts are led by the President of the Customary Court of Appeal and contain Judges as prescribed by the National Assembly for the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja and the House of Assembly for any State that claims it. In addition, both courts exercise the supervisory and appellate jurisdiction in civil cases involving issues of the customary law.


8. Magistrate Courts and District Courts


While not provided for in the 1999 Constitution, Magistrate Courts and District Courts are established by the law of the House of Assembly of a State. As for the Magistrate Court, it is a court of summary judgment as grounds are defined in this court without briefs or pleadings filed by the parties.


Actually, in the Southern part of Nigeria, they are referred to as Magistrate Courts, but in the Northern part of Nigeria, they are referred to as District Courts when they sit in their civil jurisdiction. The jurisdiction of a Magistrate Courts is provided for under the different rules of each State establishing them.

So, as you can see, there are different courts in Nigeria. Each of them is established by the 1999 Constitution (as Amended), and are authorized by the law to exercise jurisdiction at first instance. All the courts are differentiated by its position in the hierarchical pyramid of courts. Now you know the differences between all of them.


READ ALSO: Court Wor


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

NBA SECURES LANDMARK JUDGMENT ON THE STATUS OF LAWYERS IN THE NIGERIA POLICE FORCE

Dear Colleagues, I am pleased to formally inform all members of our dear association of the landmark judgment delivered by the National Industrial Court of Nigeria, Abuja Judicial Division, on 10 July 2026 in Suit No. NICN/ABJ/264/2025: Incorporated Trustees of the Nigerian Bar Association v. Police Service Commission & 5 Ors. This public interest action was instituted by the Nigerian Bar Association through the Section on Public Interest and Development Law (SPIDEL) to seek judicial interpretation and enforcement of the provisions of the Police Act, 2020 and the Rules of Professional Conduct for Legal Practitioners, 2023, particularly as they relate to the status, functions, and deployment of legal practitioners serving within the Nigeria Police Force. In a well-considered judgment, the Court upheld substantial aspects of the NBA’s claims and made important declarations and consequential orders, including: 1. Declaring that police officers who are legal practitioners b...

Are We at a Judicial Crossroads with the Decisions of Justices Umar and Omotosho on INEC’s Electoral Guidelines?

The two decisions of the Federal High Court delivered respectively by Justice Mohammed G. Umar and Justice James Kolawole Omotosho are already generating intense constitutional and electoral discourse within legal circles. Both judgments dealt with the legality of the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC)’s administrative timetable and guidelines issued for the 2027 general elections vis-à-vis the provisions of the Electoral Act 2026. Although both courts addressed substantially similar legal questions, they arrived at partially convergent and partially divergent conclusions. This has now sparked debate among senior members of the Bar on whether Justice Omotosho ought to be reprimanded for allegedly delivering a judgment inconsistent with that of Justice Umar. This article examines the two judgments, identifies their points of agreement and disagreement, and evaluates whether the controversy over judicial contradiction is legally sustainable or merely academic se...

GROUNDS FOR OBJECTING TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF A DOCUMENT IN PROCEEDINGS IN NIGERIA.

GROUNDS FOR OBJECTING TO THE ADMISSIBILITY OF A DOCUMENT IN PROCEEDINGS IN NIGERIA.  The position of E.C MPI, Esq When a witness is led in evidence in chief to tender a document, such a witness is referred to his deposition on oath and pointed to a place where he pleaded the document the document sought to be tendered. Counsel applies to show the document to the witness and asked if he recognises the document and thereafter an application to tender is made to the court. The court directs the registrar to show the document to the other counsel to either object to the admissibility of the document or allow it to be admitted. Most lawyers are faced with the problem of objecting to certain documents and sometimes when they object, they loose the point of law on which to hinge their objections. Admissibility of a document can only be objected to on points of law and in accordance with the provisions of the Evidence Act. This piece serves as a guide on how to object to documents sough...

Nigerian Bar Association, Abuja Branch Swears in New Executives body, as Steve Emelieze and Onyeka Obiajulu Emerge Chairman and Secretary Respectively.

In a significant development, the Abuja Branch of the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) held a swearing-in ceremony for its new executive committee members on Monday, June 10th, 2024. The ceremony took place at the auditorium of the NBA House and was graced by the President of the NBA, Y.C Maikyau SAN, along with several other dignitaries. The newly sworn-in executive committee members, led by Steve Emelieze, Esq as Chairman, and Onyeka Obiajulu, Esq as Secretary, took the oath of office during the ceremony. This marks an important milestone for the NBA Abuja Branch as it strives to strengthen its leadership and enhance its services to members. The association remains steadfast in its commitment to promoting the rule of law, justice, and the welfare of legal practitioners in Abuja. The newly elected executive committee members are as follows:                       Steve Okechukwu Emelieze ,             ...

NBA Anaocha Branch Honours Okey Wali, SAN with Hall Naming Recognition.

NBA Anaocha Branch Names Hall After Okey Wali, SAN The (NBA), Anaocha Branch (Family Bar), has resolved to name its main meeting hall after the 26th President of the Association, . This decision was reached during the Branch’s monthly general meeting, where members unanimously approved the naming of the hall as “Hon. Okey Wali, SAN Hall of Honour.” The honour is in recognition of Okey Wali, SAN’s outstanding contributions to the legal profession, as well as his enduring support and commitment to the growth and unity of the Nigerian Bar, particularly the Anaocha Branch. According to the Branch, the resolution reflects deep appreciation for his legacy of service, leadership, and dedication to the advancement of justice and the rule of law. The formal naming and commissioning of the hall will take place during the Branch’s 2026 Law Week , scheduled to commence on May 8, 2026 . The event is expected to attract members of the Bar, senior advocates, and key stakeholders wi...

Common Problems in Marriage: A Review of the Book of Sirach

Common Problems in Marriage: A Review of the Book of Sirach Marriage is a sacred institution ordained by God, but it is not immune to challenges. Domestic violence, spouse abuse, and other issues can strain a marriage, causing emotional and physical harm to one or both partners. In this article, we will explore these common problems in marriage and examine the teachings of the Book of Sirach on how a Christian marriage should be nurtured. Domestic Violence and Spouse Abuse Domestic violence and spouse abuse are never acceptable in any marriage. The Book of Sirach (25:26) warns, "A wicked wife is a bitter thing, her boldness is like a lion's yoke." This verse highlights the destructive nature of abuse and violence in a marriage. Sirach (26:1-4) also emphasizes the importance of a virtuous wife, who brings joy and peace to her husband. Other Challenges in Marriage Other common challenges in marriage include communication breakdown, financial stress, infidelity, ...

Preventing ATM Card Swapping at POS Centers: Safeguarding Your Finances EFCC CONNECT to Hold Awareness Lecture on October 25, 2023, at 6pm.

Safeguarding Your Finances: Preventing ATM Card Swapping at POS Centers Financial crimes have become increasingly prevalent in our society, and one area where they frequently occur is at Point of Sale (POS) centers. The EFCC CONNECT awareness lecture aims to educate individuals on the importance of financial security and provide valuable tips on protecting their savings and ATM cards. This article delves into the significance of attending such lectures and the measures we can take to prevent ATM card swapping at POS centers. Understanding the Threat: As technology advances, so do the tactics employed by criminals. ATM card swapping is a method used by fraudsters to gain unauthorized access to victims' bank accounts. These criminals discreetly switch the victim's legitimate ATM card with a counterfeit one, allowing them to withdraw funds or make unauthorized transactions. The EFCC CONNECT Awareness Lecture: The EFCC CONNECT awareness lecture is an initiative designed...

The Value of Legal Practice and the Dignity of the Profession.

The statement by that “Do not be a lawyer who charges so low that your clients do not understand the value of the profession” is not merely a comment about legal fees; it is a profound reminder about the dignity, value, and integrity of legal practice. Law is a noble profession built on years of rigorous academic training, discipline, sacrifice, and continuous learning. Every lawyer invests enormous time, resources, and mental energy in acquiring the knowledge and skills required to represent clients effectively. Beyond the years spent in universities and the Nigerian Law School, legal practitioners daily bear the burden of advocacy, research, drafting, negotiations, court appearances, and the responsibility of protecting the rights and interests of clients. Unfortunately, the increasing trend of underpricing legal services has continued to diminish the perceived value of the profession. When lawyers charge excessively low fees merely to attract clients, it sends a dan...

The First Major Casualty of Section 83 of the Electoral Act 2026 May Have Emerged

The recent decision of the Federal High Court in Fubara Dagogo v. All Progressives Congress (APC) & 3 Ors., Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/591/2026 delivered by Justice Joyce Abdulmalik, represents a significant development in Nigeria’s pre-election jurisprudence. In that case, the court struck out the suit challenging the APC National Congress and proceeded to award punitive costs of ₦10 million each against the plaintiff, Mr. Fubara Dagogo, and his counsel, Chief Sir O.A.U. Onyema, for what the court considered a frivolous and non-justiciable action. The court held that the dispute arose purely from the internal congress and nomination processes of the political party and therefore fell outside the jurisdiction of the court by virtue of Section 83(5) of the Electoral Act 2026.  Justice Abdulmalik maintained that there was no allegation or proof of any breach of the Constitution, the Electoral Act, or the party’s constitution and guidelines capable of warranting judicial inte...

Section 83 and the Myth of Judicial Silence in Party Politics

The recent assertion by my brother, Festus Okoye Esq, that lawyers have become scapegoats in internal party conflicts owing to their recourse to the courts calls for careful constitutional and judicial interrogation. At the centre of this debate lies Section 83 of the Electoral Act 2026, particularly the suggestion that it absolutely ousts the jurisdiction of the courts over the internal affairs of political parties. With the greatest respect to lawyers who are holding this view, that broad interpretation may appear overstretched and not constitutionally sustainable. Section 83(5) of the Electoral Act, read in isolation, appears to bar courts from entertaining disputes relating to party internal issues absolutely.  On a literal reading, it suggests a legislative intent to shield political parties from judicial scrutiny. That may not absolutely be true. Such a construction ignores a foundational principle of Nigeria’s constitutional order, which is the fact that...